Prop 19 Analysis and Perdiction - Medical Marijuana Is for the Rich!

Prop 19 Analysis and Perdiction

I Think California's Prop 19 will pass on Nov 19,  Do a google search and there are many more Yes on 19 pictures.

It will be good to have legal growers, and distributors that will be paying the government for protection from the DEA.  Medical Marijuana is for the rich just like Alcohol Prohibition.

From thinkquest.org
 

The easiest way to get alcohol during Prohibition was actually legal.  This was by way of prescriptions.  A doctor would be paid a set amount of money to prescribe a certain amount of liquor a day.  The doctor’s signature became extremely valuable and sometimes gang wars were fought over who owned what doctor.  Forgery was also common and gangsters often stole stacks of blank prescriptions.  These would also be on sale in a speakeasy. 

Here is an example of a prescription for whisky from 1924:

I feel like this kid - Pot for a 12 year old

South Park does Medical Marijuana

marijuana

✏★✩ Flavors of Heaven

From Human Reality  http://www.marvelousworkandawonder.org/reality/index.htm

The planets of our solar system will one day become the home residencies on which we will live forever as perfected human beings, according to our individual choice of what makes us the happiest. We made this personal choice long before our solar system was created. This solar system was created to accommodate the choices we made.

If G-D had *PERFECT* technology I guess it is possible  for us to live on Other Planets.    But this goes even deeper than that.  For the Mormons that pressure people and say "Your not going to the Celestial Kingdom (Mormon Heaven)" for Smoking Pot ...

❀ FUCK YOU !!!!   We already made our choice of flavor of Heaven,  and if you snicker at me smoking,  Well get Out I'll live in MY WORLD.   ☠

✩★

James Randi Speaks: Charles Lynch

James Randi Speaks: Charles Lynch: "

From James Randi: 'Understand this: I heartily endorse and accept marijuana use for medical purposes; research has clearly shown that it works efficiently in that role, and brings comfort and relief to the suffering. As a result of this stated conditional acceptance, I have been approached by those who advocate general use of the substance on the same level that tobacco enjoys. Generally, this makes sense to me, except that if its use were to bring with it the same dreadful health penalties that accompany tobacco, I would be reluctant to accept that. I am not a drug user, I have never even been inebriated. That is my personal choice, and I feel that other persons should also enjoy freedom of choice, even if taxes are imposed on that freedom in order to legislate it; I don't want out-of-control drivers threatening my safety, for example.'

"